Chapter 1 – Part E

Instead of the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy performing his obligated duty to enforce the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights under all the listed earlier Acts, and maintain order and decorum during the public hearing that was in front of him.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately decided to sit by idly and not voice any concerns or in defense of the interracial married couple / tenants and all their mandated rights afforded to them.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sits by idly and ignoring the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio as they engaged in this intolerable and unacceptable behavior against interracial married couple / tenants in a public hearing.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sitting by idly and ignoring and not enforcing the interracial married couple / tenants mandated rights outlined and afforded to them by the many Acts list earlier.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately and passively sits by idly and ignoring the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio as they engaged in this unacceptable behavior and not enforcing and maintaining order and decorum during the public hearing.

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy acted in the textbook legal definition of Deliberate Ignorance.

Deliberate Ignorance literally means and is defined as; one wilfully and intentionally ignoring a fact(s) when one has every reason to believe about its existence.

By the racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy deliberately shutting his eyes and ears to the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple ( tenants ).

The racist Caucasian SJTO member Kevin Lundy is actively guilty of partaking and silently authorizing the Caucasian Applicants Stella Reddy, Luigi Liscio and his son Anthony Liscio in their racist, prejudice, discriminatory behavior and victimization of the interracial married couple / tenants.

Monahan v. Cook, 2018 HRTO 428

• [15] The fair administration of justice is necessarily dependent on maintaining order and decorum in hearing rooms.  See Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2011] 1 SCR 19, 2011 SCC 2 (CanLII), at para. 69.  Furthermore, an adjudicator cannot simply close his or her eyes and pretend to be limited to what goes on at the witness stand.  Adjudicators have a duty to maintain order and decorum in their hearing rooms.

• [16] – The Tribunal has the power to address, on its own initiative, issues of courtesy and respect in the proceeding or abuse of its processes.  See Rules A4, A7 and A8 of the Social Justice Tribunals Ontario Common Rules, and Rule 1.6 of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Specific Rules.